Ventricular arrhythmias in pregnant women with and without structural heart disease: are there differences in outcomes?
https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2026-13-4-349-358
Abstract
It is well established that ventricular arrhythmia (VA) is relatively common during pregnancy and carries different clinical significance depending on the presence or absence of structural heart disease (SHD). In women with SHD, VA more often reflects electrical and hemodynamic myocardial instability and is associated with an increased risk of heart failure, life-threatening tachyarrhythmias, hospitalization, and adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes. In contrast, in women with a structurally normal heart, VA is predominantly idiopathic and has traditionally been considered benign. However, the physiological changes of pregnancy, including increased circulating blood volume, activation of neurohormonal mechanisms, and alterations in the electrophysiological properties of the myocardium, may modify the course of VA and its potential impact on both maternal and fetal outcomes. Quantitative assessment of arrhythmic burden is therefore of particular importance. VA burden is defined as the proportion of ventricular ectopic complexes relative to the total number of heartbeats during the monitoring period and is assessed primarily by Holter ECG monitoring. Recent studies in pregnant women without SHD suggest a possible association between a high VA burden and certain obstetric and fetal/neonatal complications; however, the threshold values associated with individual adverse outcomes vary considerably. Current pregnancy risk stratification models, including mWHO 2.0 and CARPREG II, do not incorporate ventricular ectopic burden as an independent parameter. This review compares data from studies including pregnant women with VA both with and without SHD, discusses potential mechanisms underlying adverse outcomes and the role of serial Holter ECG monitoring, and highlights the limitations of the current evidence base. Prospective studies with standardized assessment of arrhythmic burden, evaluation of VA dynamics across pregnancy trimesters, and long-term postpartum follow-up are needed to identify new risk predictors and improve individualized risk stratification
About the Authors
N. S. VolodichevaRussian Federation
Nataliia S. Volodicheva, Researcher of the research laboratory of electrocardiology, assistant professor of faculty therapy with clinic
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
E. S. Zhabina
Russian Federation
Ekaterina S. Zhabina, MD, PhD, Senior researcher of the research laboratory of electrocardiology, assistant professor of faculty therapy with clinic
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
T. V. Treshkur
Tatyana V. Treshkur, MD, PhD, Associate professor, Head of the research laboratory of electrocardiology
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
References
1. Kirgizova MA, Dedkova AA, Kisteneva IV. Assessment of the effect of cardiac rhythm and conduction disorders on the course and outcome of pregnancy: data of the Arrhythmia Center. Russ J Cardiol 2019; 7:7-11.
2. De Backer J, Haugaa KH, Hasselberg NE, et al. 2025 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease and pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2025; 46:4462-4568.
3. Senarath S, Nanayakkara P, Beale AL, et al. Diagnosis and management of arrhythmias in pregnancy. Europace. 2022; 24:1041–1051.
4. Siu SC, Silversides CK, et al. Risk of complications during pregnancy in women with heart disease: the CARPREG II Study. Lancet. 2018; 391:1643–1651.
5. Mozheyko L, Poukh M. Features of pregnancy, delivery and perinatal outcomes in women with heart rhythm disorder. Cardiology in Belarus. 2021; 4:512-526.
6. Khidirova L, Keshikova D, Olshevskaya O. Ventricular arrhythmias during pregnancy. Tactics of management of patients. Ateroscleroz. 2023; 19:162-170.
7. Scott NS, Sarma AA, Choi E. Bridging the Gap in Maternal Cardiovascular Risk: Identifying Patients at Elevated Risk. JACC Adv. 2023. 27; 2:100177.
8. Siu SC, Sermer M, Colman JM, et. al. Cardiac Disease in Pregnancy (CARPREG) Investigators. Prospective multicenter study of pregnancy outcomes in women with heart disease. Circulation. 2001. 104:515-21.
9. Siu SC, Silversides CK, et al. Risk of complications during pregnancy in women with heart disease: the CARPREG II Study. Lancet. 2018; 391:1643–1651.
10. Drenthen W, Boersma E, Balci A, et.al. ZAHARA Investigators. Predictors of pregnancy complications in women with congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2010; 31:2124-32.
11. Kayle S, Nihar R, Robert W, et.al. Cardio-obstetrics: Recognizing and managing cardiovascular complications of pregnancy. Spatz Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 2020; 87: 43-52.
12. Van Hagen IM, Roos-Hesselink JW. Pregnancy in congenital heart disease: risk prediction and counselling. Heart. 2020; 106:1853-1861.
13. Slastnikova I, Sharkhun O. Clinical features of various types of rhythm disorders during pregnancy. Professorial journal. 2025; 1-2:13-21.
14. de Lavallaz JD, Mézier J, Mertz L, et.al. Risk factors for the development of premature ventricular complex-induced cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023; 66:1145-1163.
15. Olesin AI, Konstantinova IV, Tyuteleva NN, et.al. Clinical and prognostic significance of left ventricular dysfunction predictors in patients with ventricular ectopy and without structural heart disease. Fundamental and Clinical Medicine. 2023; 8: 53-67.
16. Roos-Hesselink J, Baris L, Johnson M, et.al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with cardiovascular disease: evolving trends over 10 years in the ESC Registry Of Pregnancy And Cardiac disease (ROPAC). Eur Heart J. 2019; 40: 3848-3855.
17. Wald RM, Silversides CK, Kingdom J, et.al. Maternal Cardiac Output and Fetal Doppler Predict Adverse Neonatal Outcomes in Pregnant Women With Heart Disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015; 23;4(11).
18. Lin J, Qian Y, Chen Q, et.al. The burden of premature ventricular contractions predicts adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes among pregnant women without structural heart disease: A prospective cohort study. Clin Cardiol. 2021; 44: 833-838.
19. Chou CC, Lee HL, Wo HT, et.al. Obstetric and fetal/neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with frequent premature ventricular complexes and structurally normal heart. Int J Cardiol. 2022; 371: 160-166.
20. Tong C, Kiess M, Deyell MW, et.al. Impact of frequent premature ventricular contractions on pregnancy outcomes. Heart. 2018; 104:1370-1375.
21. Muñoz-Ortiz E, Miranda-Arboleda AF, Saavedra-González YA, et.al. Characterization of cardiac arrhythmias and maternal-fetal outcomes in pregnant women: A prospective cohort study. Rev Port Cardiol. 2024; 43: 67-74.
22. Mikhailov E.N., Gizatulina T.P., Lebedev D.S., et.al. 2025 Clinical practice guidelines for Ventricular arrhythmias of the heart and Sudden cardiac death. Russ J Cardiol 2025; 30:11-6670.
Review
For citations:
Volodicheva N.S., Zhabina E.S., Treshkur T.V. Ventricular arrhythmias in pregnant women with and without structural heart disease: are there differences in outcomes? Translational Medicine. 2026;13(4):349-358. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2026-13-4-349-358
JATS XML





















