Titin Modification as a Potential Treatment for Chronic Heart Failure with Preserved Eject Fraction
https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2026-13-31-41
EDN: DGGYWQ
Abstract
Chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (CHFpEF) is a multifactorial condition with various pathophysiological causes and morphological manifestations, which largely determines the use of therapeutic approaches adapted to the patient’s clinical phenotype. In recent years, CHF has been increasingly replacing chronic heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (CHFrEF), and is an equally serious condition that reduces the quality of life of patients on a par with CHFrEF. Currently, CHFpEF affects approximately 9 % of individuals over the age of 60, and the 5-year survival rate for this form of heart failure is roughly 35 %. The contemporary pharmacological armamentarium for managing CHFpEF symptoms remains notably limited. One promising therapeutic avenue involves targeting the modification processes — and consequently the mechanical properties — of titin, a major protein of the muscle sarcomere. Active research is currently underway on the development and application of agents that influence titin modification, with ongoing preclinical and clinical trials. This review examines the structure and post-translational modification (predominantly phosphorylation) of titin. It also explores the various signaling pathways whose dysregulation is associated with CHFpEF pathogenesis, as well as data from studies investigating drugs that target these pathways in both animal models and human subjects. The review presents an analysis of domestic and international literature published between 2000 and 2026, sourced from platforms including PubMed, Elsevier, and Google Scholar. Current evidence indicates that modulating titin modification is a potentially effective strategy for treating chronic heart failure. These findings underscore the need for further investigation in this field. The ultimate goal is to identify novel pharmacological solutions and integrate them into clinical practice to enable personalized management of CHFpEF syndrome.
Keywords
About the Authors
Yuri A. VakhrushevRussian Federation
Yuri A. Vakhrushev, MD, PhD, Assistant of the Department of Laboratory Medicine with the Clinic of the Institute of Medical Education, Assistant of the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Institute of Medical Education,
Akkuratova str., 2, St. Petersburg, 197341.
Competing Interests:
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Abdulkadir A. Bagandov
Russian Federation
Abdulkadir A. Bagandov, Student of the Faculty of Medicine at the Institute of Medical Education,
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Elena A. Lyasnikova
Russian Federation
Elena A. Lyasnikova, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Faculty Therapy with the IMO Clinic,
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Anna A. Kostareva
Russian Federation
Anna A. Kostareva, MD, DSc, Professor of the Department of Faculty Therapy with the Clinic of the Institute of Medical Education, Director of the Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics,
St. Petersburg.
Competing Interests:
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
1. Savarese G, Becher PM, Lund LH, et al. Global burden of heart failure: a comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology. Cardiovascular Research. 2023;118:3272–3287. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvac013
2. Sauer AJ, Ter Maaten JM, Savarese G. Established and emerging pharmacologic options and unmet need in HFpEF and HFmrEF. ESC Heart Fail. 2026;13(2):xvag056. https://doi.org/10.1093/eschf/xvag056
3. Anker SD, Usman MS, Anker MS, et al. Patient phenotype profiling in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction to guide therapeutic decision making. A scientific statement of the Heart Failure Association, the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology, and the European Society of Hypertension. Eur J Heart Fail. 2023;25(7):936‒955. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.2894
4. Paulus WJ, Zile MR. From systemic inflammation to myocardial fibrosis: the heart failure with preserved ejection fraction paradigm revisited. Circ Res. 2021;128(10):1451‒1467, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318159
5. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2023 Focused update of the 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(37):3627‒3639. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad195
6. Vaduganathan M, Docherty KF, Claggett BL, et al. SGLT-2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure: a comprehensive meta-analysis of five randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2022;400:757‒767. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01429-5
7. Granzier H, Labeit S. Cardiac titin: An adjustable multi-functional spring. J Physiol. 2002;541(Pt2):335–342. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2001.014381
8. Bang ML, Centner T, Fornoff F, et al. The complete gene sequence of titin, expression of an unusual approximately 700-kDa titin isoform, and its interaction with obscurin identify a novel Z-line to I-band linking system. Circ Res. 2001;89(11):1065– 1072. https://doi.org/10.1161/hh2301.100981
9. Linke WA, Hamdani N. Gigantic business: titin properties and function through thick and thin. Circ Res. 2014;114(6):1052–1068. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.301286
10. Misaka T, Yoshihisa A, Takeishi Y. Titin in muscular dystrophy and cardiomyopathy: urinary titin as a novel marker. Clin Chim Acta. 2019;495:123‒128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2019.04.005
11. Freiburg A, Trombitas K, Hell W, et al. Series of exon-skipping events in the elastic spring region of titin as the structural basis for myofibrillar elastic diversity. Circ Res. 2000;86(11):1114‒1121. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.86.11.1114
12. Guo W, Bharmal SJ, Esbona K, et al. Titin diversity-alternative splicing gone wild. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:753675. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/753675
13. Neagoe C, Kulke М, Del Monte F, et al. Titin isoform switch in ischemic human heart disease. Circulation. 2002;106(11):1333‒1341. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000029803.93022.93
14. Lunde IG, Wakimoto H, Burke MA, et al. Abstract 279: a deletion in the N2A region of titin carried by muscular dystrophy with myositis (mdm) mice severely affects skeletal muscle, but not the heart. Circulation Research. 2014;115:279. https://doi.org/10.1161/res.115.suppl_1.279
15. Balogh-Molnár A, Tordai H, Mártonfalvi Z. Dephosphorylation-induced structural reorganization of skeletal muscle titin molecules. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;322:147085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.147085
16. Huttlin EL, Jedrychowski MP, Elias JE, et al. A tissue-specific atlas of mouse protein phosphorylation and expression. Cell. 2010;143(7):1174‒1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.001
17. Hidalgo CG, Chung CS, Saripalli C, et al. The multifunctional Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II delta (CaMKIIδ) phosphorylates cardiac titin’s spring elements. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2013;54(1):90‒97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.11.012
18. Krüger M, Kötter S, Grützner A, et al. Protein kinase G modulates human myocardial passive stiffness by phosphorylation of the titin springs. Circ Res. 2009;104(1):87‒94. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.184408
19. Hamdani N, Krysiak J, Kreusser M, et al. Crucial role for Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase-II in regulating diastolic stress of normal and failing hearts via titin phosphorylation. Circ Res. 2013;112(4):664‒674. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.300105
20. Beqqali A, Bollen IAE, Rasmussen TB, et al. A mutation in the glutamate-rich region of RNA-binding motif protein 20 causes dilated cardiomyopathy through missplicing of titin and impaired Frank-Starling mechanism. Cardiovasc Res. 2016;112(1):452‒463. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvw192
21. Hopf AE, Andresen C, Kötter S, et al. Diabetes-induced cardiomyocyte passive stiffening is caused by impaired insulin-dependent titin modification and can be modulated by neuregulin-1. Circ Res. 2018;123(3):342‒355. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.312166
22. Lemmens K, Doggen K, De Keulenaer GW. Role of neuregulin-1/ErbB signaling in cardiovascular physiology and disease: implications for therapy of heart failure. Circulation. 2007;116(8):954–960. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.690487
23. Li B, Zheng Z, Wei Y, et al. Therapeutic effects of neuregulin-1 in diabetic cardiomyopathy rats. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2011;10:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-10-69
24. Follmann M, Ackerstaff J, Redlich G, et al. Discovery of the Soluble Guanylate Cyclase Stimulator Vericiguat (BAY 1021189) for the Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure. J Med Chem. 2017;60(12):5146–5161. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00449
25. Sandner P. From molecules to patients: exploring the therapeutic role of soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators. Biol Chem. 2018;399(7):679–690. https://doi.org/10.1515/hsz-2018-0155.
26. Armstrong PW, Pieske B, Anstrom KJ, et al. Vericiguat in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(20):1883–1893. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1915928
27. Palazzuoli A, Severino P, D’Amato A, et al. Distinct profiles and new pharmacological targets for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024;25(7):270. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2507270
28. Michel K, Herwig M, Werner F, et al. C-type natriuretic peptide moderates titin-based cardiomyocyte stiffness. JCI Insight. 2020;5(22):e139910. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.139910
29. D’Elia E, Iacovoni A, Vaduganathan M, et al. Neprilysin inhibition in heart failure: mechanisms and substrates beyond modulating natriuretic peptides. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19(6):710‒717. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.799
30. van Heerebeek L, Hamdani N, Falcão-Pires I, et al. Low myocardial protein kinase G activity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2012;126(7):830–839. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.076075
31. Furukawa N, Matsui H, Sunaga H, et al. Sacubitril/ valsartan improves diastolic left ventricular stiffness with increased titin phosphorylation via cGMP-ПК-G activation in diabetic mice. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):25081. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75757-8
32. Lee DI, Zhu G, Sasaki T, et al. Phosphodiesterase 9A controls nitric-oxide-independent cGMP and hypertrophic heart disease. Nature. 2015;519(7544):472–476. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14332
33. Redfield MM, Chen HH, Borlaug BA, et al. Effect of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition on exercise capacity and clinical status in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;309(12):1268–1277. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.2024
34. Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, Anand IS, et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(17):1609–1620. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1908655
35. Richards DA, Aronovitz MJ, Liu P, et al. CRD733, a novel PDE9 (Phosphodiesterase 9) inhibitor, reverses pressure overload-induced heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2021;14(1):e007300. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAIL-URE.120.007300
36. Lee DI, Zhu G, Sasaki T, et al. Phosphodiesterase 9A controls nitric-oxide-independent cGMP and hypertrophic heart disease. Nature. 2015;519(7544):472–476. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14332
37. Wang PX, Li ZM, Cai SD, et al. C33(S), a novel PDE9A inhibitor, protects against rat cardiac hypertrophy through upregulating cGMP signaling. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2017;38(9):1257– 1268. https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2017.38
38. Hamdani N, Kolijn D, Lodi M, et al. Endothelial and cardiomyocyte dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is attenuated via PDE9A inhibition. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;68(1):188. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1705428
39. Scott NJA, Rademaker MT, Charles CJ, et al. Hemodynamic, hormonal, and renal actions of phosphodiesterase-9 inhibition in experimental heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(7):889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.067
40. Methawasin M, Strom J, Borkowski T, et al. Phosphodiesterase 9a inhibition in mouse models of diastolic dysfunction. Circ Heart Fail. 2020;13(5):e006609. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR-CHEARTFAILURE.119.006609
41. Lee JH, Park H, Lee SH, et al. Novel PDE9 inhibitors, KR39526 and KR39582, attenuate cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis induced by pressure overload. J Pharmacol Sci. 2025;158(4):353–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphs.2025.05.015
42. Udelson J, Bělohlávek J, Dukát A, et al. Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of CRD-740, a PDE9 inhibitor, in chronic heart failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2026;14(1):102706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2025.102706
43. Herrero-Galán E, Martínez-Martín I, Alegre-Cebollada J. Redox regulation of protein nanomechanics in health and disease: lessons from titin. Redox Biol. 2019;21:101074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2018.101074
44. Giganti D, Yan K, Badilla CL, et al. Disulfide isomerization reactions in titin immunoglobulin domains enable a mode of protein elasticity. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):185. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02528-7
45. Alegre-Cebollada J, et al. S-glutathionylation of cryptic cysteines enhances titin elasticity by blocking protein folding. Cell. 2014;156(6):1235–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.056
46. Herrero-Galán E, Martínez-Martín I, Sánchez-González C, et al. Basal oxidation of conserved cysteines modulates cardiac titin stiffness and dynamics. Redox Biol. 2022;52:102306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2022.10230
47. Grutzner A, et al. Modulation of titin-based stiffness by disulfide bonding in the cardiac titin N2-B unique sequence. Biophys J. 2009;97(3):825–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2009.05.037
48. Loescher CM, Breitkreuz M, Li Y, et al. Regulation of titin-based cardiac stiffness by unfolded domain oxidation (UnDOx). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(39):24545‒24556. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004900117
49. Coelho-Sampaio T, Tenchov B, Nascimento MA, et al. Type IV collagen conforms to the organization of polylaminin adsorbed on planar substrata. Acta Biomater. 2020;111:242‒253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.05.021
50. Hochman-Mendez C, Curty E, Taylor DA. Change the laminin, change the cardiomyocyte: improve untreatable heart failure. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(17):6013. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21176013
51. Gramlich M, Pane LS, Zhou Q, et al. Antisense-mediated exon skipping: a therapeutic strategy for titin-based dilated cardiomyopathy. EMBO Mol Med. 2015;7(5):562–576. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201505047
52. Hahn JK, Neupane B, Pradhan K, et al. The assembly and evaluation of antisense oligonucleotides applied in exon skipping for titin-based mutations in dilated cardiomyopathy. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2019;131:12‒19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2019.04.014
53. Methawasin M, Meinke S, Radke MH, et al. Rbm20 antisense oligonucleotides alleviate diastolic dysfunction in a mouse model of cardiometabolic heart failure (HFpEF). Cardiovasc Res. 2025;121(13):2027‒2041. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvaf171
54. Hahremani S, Kanwal A, Pettinato A, et al. CRISPR activation reverses haploinsufficiency and functional deficits caused by TTN truncation variants. Circulation. 2024;149(16):1285‒1297. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.063972
Review
For citations:
Vakhrushev Yu.A., Bagandov A.A., Lyasnikova E.A., Kostareva A.A. Titin Modification as a Potential Treatment for Chronic Heart Failure with Preserved Eject Fraction. Translational Medicine. 2026;13(1):31-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2026-13-31-41. EDN: DGGYWQ
JATS XML





















