Preview

Translational Medicine

Advanced search

Antenatal management and terms of delivery in monoamniotic twin pregnancy

https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2019-6-5-

Abstract

Background. Monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancies (MCMA) have very high rates of antenatal fetal loss (8–42 %). Objective. The aim of the study was to estimate the terms of delivery, complications and pregnancy outcomes in MCMA. Design and methods. A retrospective study of MCMA outcomes was conducted in 18 patients. Delivery was planned by cesarean section after 32 weeks of gestation. Results. The average term of delivery was 34 weeks 1 day. In 16 (88.9 %) cases was performed the elective cesarean section, in 2 (11.1 %) — the emergency. The indication for emergency delivery was in 1 case (5.6 %) the deterioration of fetoplacental hemodynamics and in 1 case (5.6 %) premature rupture of membrane. The average weight of the newborns was 2078 g with an average Apgar score of 7.4/8.3 points. There was a collision of the umbilical cord in 14 (77.8 %) cases. There were no cases of antenatal death in the study group after reaching 24 weeks of gestation. Conclusion. The study indicate a low risk of antenatal loss in MCMA after 24 weeks of gestation, despite the presence of umbilical cord collision in most of the cases, which justifies the planning of delivery after 36 weeks of gestation in uncomplicated course of pregnancy.

About the Authors

A. V. Mikhailov
Saint Petersburg State “Maternity Clinic № 17”; North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation

Mikhailov Anton V., Dr. Sc., Professor, Chief

Chief of Department of Women's Reproductive Health,

Chief Obstetrician-Gynecologist of the Ministry of Health



A. N. Romanovsky
Saint Petersburg State “Maternity Clinic № 17”; North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov; Federal State Budgetary Education Institution of Higher Education «Saint-Petersburg State University»

Romanovsky Artem N., Doctor of the Maternity Ward

Assistant of Department of Women’s Reproductive Health

Assistant of Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology



T. A. Kashtanova
Saint Petersburg State “Maternity Clinic № 17”
Kashtanova Tatiana A., Head of the Department of Prenatal Diagnostics


I. V. Kyanksep
Saint Petersburg State “Maternity Clinic № 17”
Kyanksep Inna V., Doctor of Department of Prenatal Diagnostics


A. A. Kuznetsov
Saint Petersburg State “Maternity Clinic № 17”; Federal State Budgetary Education Institution of Higher Education «Academician I. P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University» of Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

Kuznetsov Alexander A., Doctor of the Maternity Ward

PhD Student of Obstetrics and Gynecology Department



V. E. Movchan
North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov
Movchan Veronika E., Resident of Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of S. N. Davydov


F. A. Ovsyannikov
Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Ovsyannikov Filipp A., PhD, Obstetrician-Gynecologist


I. R. Bazarov
North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov
Bazarov Ilya R., Resident of Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of S. N. Davydov


References

1. Peeters SH, Devliеger R, Middeldorp JM et al. Fetal surgery in complicated monoamniotic pregnancies: case series and systematic review of the literature. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(6):586–591.

2. Dias T, Mahsud-Dornan S, Bhide A et al. Cord entanglement and perinatal outcome in monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35(2):201– 204.

3. Van Mieghem T, De Heus R, Lewi L et al. Prenatal management of monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(3):498–506.

4. Prefumo F, Fichera A, Pagani G et al. The natural history of monoamniotic twin pregnancies: a case series and systematic review of the literature. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35(3):274–280.

5. Mikhailov A, Romanovsky A. Multiple pregnancy under ultrasound umbrella. Donald Sch J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;5(3):219–230.

6. Ovsyannikov FA, Romanovsky AN. Current treatment of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Translyatsionnaya meditsina=Translational Medicine. 2017;4(4):36–42. In Russian

7. Mikhailov AV, Romanovsky AN, Shlykova AV et al. Specific complications of monochorionic multiple pregnancy – twin-to-twin transfusion and twin anemiapolycythemia syndromes. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya Sankt-Peterburga=Obstetrics and Gynaecology of SaintPetersburg. 2017;(2):18–23. In Russian

8. Allen VM, Windrim R, Barrett J et al. Management of monoamniotic twin pregnancies: a case series and systematic review of literature. BJOG. 2001;108(9):931– 936.

9. Pasquini L, Wimalasundera RC, Fichera C et al. High perinatal survival in monoamniotic twins managed by prophylactic sulindac, intensive ultrasound surveillance, and Cesarean delivery at 32 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28(5):681–687.

10. Peek MJ, McCarthy A, Kyle P et al. Medical amnioreduction with sulindac to reduce cord complications in monoamniotic twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1997;176(2):334–336.

11. Romanovsky AN, Mikhailov AV, Kashtanova TA et al. Monochorionic monoamniotic multiple pregnancy – main complications and management. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya Sankt-Peterburga=Obstetrics and Gynaecology of SaintPetersburg. 2019;(1):14–18. In Russian


Review

For citations:


Mikhailov A.V., Romanovsky A.N., Kashtanova T.A., Kyanksep I.V., Kuznetsov A.A., Movchan V.E., Ovsyannikov F.A., Bazarov I.R. Antenatal management and terms of delivery in monoamniotic twin pregnancy. Translational Medicine. 2019;6(5):39-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2019-6-5-

Views: 5849


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-4495 (Print)
ISSN 2410-5155 (Online)