Preview

Трансляционная медицина

Расширенный поиск

СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ АСПЕКТЫ ХИРУРГИИ АНЕВРИЗМ ИНФРАРЕНАЛЬНОГО ОТДЕЛА АОРТЫ

https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2017-4-4-14-22

Полный текст:

Аннотация

В течение последних двух десятилетий произошел качественный скачок развития в эндоваскулярных технологиях лечения пациентов с аневризмой брюшного отдела аорты (AБA). Сегодня эндоваскулярный метод лечения (EVAR) считается методом выбора для большинства пациентов с АБА. Рандомизированные контролируемые исследования предоставили убедительные доказательства преимущества EVAR. Однако, несмотря на это, результаты лечения методом EVAR варьируются и некоторые аспекты требуют дальнейшего изучения, например, роль медикаментозной терапии в лечении АБА, показания к операции у женщин и у пожилых пациентов, долгосрочное наблюдение за пациентами после EVAR, возможность одномоментного стентирования почечных артерий, целесообразность EVAR при диссекциях АБА. В предлагаемой к вниманию статье рассматривается современный взгляд на проблему и предлагается обзор исследований по EVAR.

Об авторах

Е. Д. Зверева
Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр им. В. А. Алмазова» Минздрава России
Россия

аспирант кафедры хирургических болезней, врач сердечно-сосудистый хирург,

ул. Аккуратова, д. 2, Санкт-Петербург, 197341



Д. А. Зверев
Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр им. В. А. Алмазова» Минздрава России

к.м.н., заведующий НИЛ интервенционной кардиологии, доцент кафедры хирургических болезней,

Санкт-Петербург



М. Л. Гордеев
Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр им. В. А. Алмазова» Минздрава России

д.м.н., профессор, зав. научно-исследовательским отделом кардиоторакальной хирургии, зав. кафедрой сердечно-сосудистой хирургии,

Санкт-Петербург



Список литературы

1. Freeman ME, Leeds FH. Vein inlay graft in the treatment of aneurysms and thrombosis of the abdominal aorta; a preliminary communication with report of 3 cases. Angiology. 1951;2:579 – 587.

2. Dubost C, Allary M, Oeconomos N. Treatment of aortic aneurysms; removal of the aneurysm; re-establishment of continuity by grafts of preserved human aorta. Mem Acad Chir (Paris). 1951;77:381 – 383.

3. Volodos NL. Historical perspective: the first steps in endovascular aortic repair: how it all began. J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20 (Suppl. 1):I3 – I23.

4. Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991;5:491–499.

5. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, et al. Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126: 441 – 449.

6. McGregor JC, Pollock JG, Anton HC. The value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Scott Med J. 1975;20:133–137.

7. Nordon IM, Hinchliffe RJ, Loftus IM, Thompson MM. Pathophysiology and epidemiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;8:92 – 102.

8. Limet R, Sakalihassan N, Albert A. Determination of the expansion rate and incidence of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1991;14:540 – 548.

9. Choke E, Cockerill G, Wilson WR, et al. Areview of biological factors implicated in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;30:227 – 244.

10. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Lancet. 1998; 352:1649 – 1655.

11. Brown LC, Powell JT. Risk factors for aneurysm rupture in patients kept under ultrasound surveillance. UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Ann Surg. 1999; 230: 289 – 296; discussion 296 – 297.

12. Mani K, Bjorck M, Lundkvist J, Wanhainen A. Improved long-term survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Circulation. 2009;120:201 – 211.

13. Ashton HA, Buxton MJ, Day NE, et al. Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study G. The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360:1531 – 1539.

14. Svensjo S, Bjorck M, Gurtelschmid M, et al. Low prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm among 65-yearold Swedish men indicates a change in the epidemiology of the disease. Circulation. 2011;124: 1118 – 1123.

15. Lederle FA, Wilson SE, Johnson GR, et al. Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1437 – 1444.

16. Cao P, De Rango P, Verzini F, et al. Comparison of surveillance versus aortic endografting for small aneurysm repair (CAESAR): results from a randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41: 13–25.

17. Ouriel K, Clair DG, Kent KC, Zarins CK, for the Positive Impact of Endovascular Options for treating Aneurysms Early (PIVOTAL) Investigators. Endovascular repair compared with surveillance for patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51:1081 – 1087.

18. Chaikof EL, Brewster DC, Dalman RL, et al. The care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: the Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines. J Vasc Surg. 2009; 50:S2 – 49.

19. Moll FL, Powell JT, Fraedrich G, et al. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41 (Suppl. 1):S1–S58.

20. Mani K, Lees T, Beiles B, et al. Treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm in nine countries 2005 – 2009: a vascunet report. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;42: 598 – 607.

21. Bown MJ, Sweeting MJ, Brown LC, et al. Surveillance intervals for small abdominal aortic aneurysms: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2013;309:806 – 813.

22. Chuter TA, Risberg B, Hopkinson BR, et al. Clinical experience with a bifurcated endovascular graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 1996;24:655 – 666.

23. Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, et al. Long-term comparison of endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 1988 – 1997.

24. Stather PW, Sidloff D, Dattani N, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the early and late outcomes of open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2013;100:863 – 872.

25. White GH, Yu W, May J, et al. Endoleak as a complication of endoluminal grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms: classification, incidence, diagnosis, and management. J Endovasc Surg. 1997;4:152 – 168.

26. Chuter TA, Faruqi RM, Sawhney R, et al. Endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:98–105.

27. Bastos Goncalves F, Baderkhan H, et al. Early sac shrinkage predicts a low risk of late complications after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 2014;101:802 – 810.

28. Torsello G, Troisi N, Donas KP, Austermann M. Evaluation of the Endurant stent graft under instructions for use vs off-label conditions for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:300 – 306.

29. Lee JT, Ullery BW, Zarins CK, et al. EVAR deployment in anatomically challenging necks outside the IFU. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;46: 65–73.

30. Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Buth J, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1607 – 1618.

31. Blankensteijn JD, de Jong SE, Prinssen M, et al, Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM) Trial Group. Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2398 – 2405.

32. Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, et al. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:843 – 848.

33. EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005; 365: 2179 – 2186.

34. Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, et al, Open Versus Endovascular Repair (OVER) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009;302:1535 – 1542.

35. Hinchliffe RJ, Bruijstens L, MacSweeney ST, Braithwaite BD. A randomised trial of endovascular and open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm – results of a pilot study and lessons learned for future studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;32: 506 – 513; discussion 514 – 515.

36. Reimerink JJ, Hoornweg LL, Vahl AC, et al, Amsterdam Acute Aneurysm Trial Collaborators. Endovascular repair versus open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2013;258:248–256.

37. IMPROVE Trial Investigators, Powell JT, Sweeting MJ, Thompson MM, et al. Endovascular or open repair strategy for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 30 day outcomes from IMPROVE randomised trial. BMJ. 2014;348:f7661.

38. IMPROVE Trial Investigators. The effect of aortic morphology on peri-operative mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1328 – 1334.

39. IMPROVE Trial Investigators. Endovascular strategy or open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: one-year outcomes from the IMPROVE randomized trial. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:2061 – 2069.

40. Veith FJ, Rockman CB. The recent randomized trials of EVAR versus open repairfor ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms are misleading. Vascular. 2015;23: 217 – 219.

41. Mani K, Bjorck M, Wanhainen A. Changes in the management of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm disease in Sweden. Br J Surg. 2013;100:638 – 644.


Для цитирования:


Зверева Е.Д., Зверев Д.А., Гордеев М.Л. СОВРЕМЕННЫЕ АСПЕКТЫ ХИРУРГИИ АНЕВРИЗМ ИНФРАРЕНАЛЬНОГО ОТДЕЛА АОРТЫ. Трансляционная медицина. 2017;4(4):14-22. https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2017-4-4-14-22

For citation:


Zvereva E.D., Zverev D.A., Gordeev M.L. MODERN ASPECTS OF ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM SURGERY (REVIEW). Translational Medicine. 2017;4(4):14-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2017-4-4-14-22

Просмотров: 178


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-4495 (Print)
ISSN 2410-5155 (Online)