Effect of hydrogel based on tissue extract of uterine leiomyoma enhances osteogenic activity of osteoblasts
https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2026-13-2-177-187
Abstract
Background. The extracellular matrix plays a key role in maintaining homeostasis and bone tissue regeneration by defining the conditions for cell differentiation and intercellular interactions. The native extracellular matrix is a complex three-dimensional network of structural proteins, glycoproteins, and proteoglycans that provide mechanical support to cells and transmit regulatory signals. 2D-culture systems do not reproduce the complex organization of the cellular microenvironment; therefore, the development of 3D-systems for bone tissue differentiation and remodeling in vitro remains an important challenge. Objective. To evaluate the biocompatibility of the hydrogel based on a tissue extract of uterine leiomyoma and its potential to regulate osteogenic differentiation and mineralization of osteoblasts in mono- and co-culture with endothelial cells. Materials and Methods. The tissue extract of uterine leiomyoma was obtained using a modified protocol originally developed for producing Matrigel®. Osteoblasts were cultured within the hydrogel in mono- and co-culture with endothelial cells under osteogenic conditions. Cell viability and morphology were assessed by live-cell microscopy. Mineralization of the extracellular matrix was evaluated using Alizarin Red S staining. Results. The hydrogel based on tissue extract of uterine leiomyoma demonstrated high biocompatibility toward osteoblasts, supporting their viability, promoting differentiation into osteocyte-like cells, and enhancing extracellular matrix mineralization. In co-culture with endothelial cells, these effects were further enhanced, indicating the important role of intercellular interactions. Conclusion. The hydrogel based on tissue extract of uterine leiomyoma represents a promising 3D culture model for the studying osteogenic differentiation of osteoblasts.
Keywords
About the Authors
D. A. SerdiukovaRussian Federation
Daria A. Serdiukova, PhD in Biological Sciences, Research Scientist, Laboratory of Regenerative Biomedicine
4 Tikhoretsky ave., St. Petersburg, 194064
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
A. Babakovskaya
Russian Federation
Alyona Babakovskaya, Junior Research Scientist, Laboratory of Regenerative Biomedicine
4 Tikhoretsky ave., St. Petersburg, 194064
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
I. A. Karaman
Russian Federation
Irina A. Karaman, Laboratory Assistant, Laboratory of Regenerative biomedicine
4 Tikhoretsky ave., St. Petersburg, 194064
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
D. D. Floren
Russian Federation
Daria D. Floren, Junior Research Scientist, Laboratory of Regenerative Biomedicine
4 Tikhoretsky ave., St. Petersburg, 194064
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
A I. Avdeev
Russian Federation
Alexander I. Avdeev, MD, PhD, Head of the Scientific Department for the Treatment of Injuries and Their Consequences
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
S. A. Bozhkova
Russian Federation
Svetlana A. Bozhkova, MD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Scientific Department of Prevention and Treatment of Wound Infection
St. Petersburg
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
O. N. Demidov
Russian Federation
Oleg N. Demidov, MD, DSc, Leading Research Scientist; Professor at Sirius University of Science and Technology
4 Tikhoretsky ave., St. Petersburg, 194064
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
S. V. Piatnitskaia
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. Piatnitskaia, MD, PhD, head of the bioprinting laboratory, Institute of Fundamental Medicine; associate professor, department of internal medicine and clinical psychology
Ufa
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
V. S. Shchekin
Russian Federation
Vlas S. Shchekin, MD, PhD, Head of the Morphology Laboratory, Institute of Fundamental Medicine
Ufa
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
Z. M. Galanova
Russian Federation
Zulfiya M. Galanova, MD, PhD, Head of the Gynecology Department Hospital
Ufa
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
R. A. Zamanova
Russian Federation
Rozalia A. Zamanova, Junior Research Scientist, Bioprinting Laboratory, Institute of Fundamental Medicine
Ufa
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
A. I. Fairushina
Russian Federation
Adelia I. Fairushina, PhD in Biological Sciences, Junior Research Scientist, Bioprinting Laboratory, Institute of Fundamental
Medicine
Ufa
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
V. N. Pavlov
Russian Federation
Valentin N. Pavlov, MD, DSc, Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of the Department of Urology and Oncology
Ufa
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
A. B. Malashicheva
Russian Federation
Anna B. Malashicheva, DSc in Biological Sciences, Chief Research Scientist, Head of the Laboratory of Regenerative Biomedicine, Institute of Cytology Russian Academy of Sciences; Senior Research Scientist, Laboratory of Cell Cultures, Institute of Fundamental Medicine
4 Tikhoretsky ave., St. Petersburg, 194064
Ufa
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
References
1. Andreeva ER, Matveeva DK, Zhidkova OV, Buravkova LB. Extracellular matrix as a factor regulating the physiological microenvironment of the cell. Progress in Physiological Science. 2024;55(1):16‒30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/s0301179824010033, https://elibrary.ru/xjcavk
2. Cheong S, Peng Y, Lu F, He Y. Structural extracellular matrix-mediated molecular signaling in wound repair and tissue regeneration. Biochimie. 2025;229:58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2024.10.003
3. Kamal KM, Ghazali AR, Selvarajah GT, et al. The extracellular matrix: structure, composition, biological functions, diseases, and therapeutic targets. Molecular Biomedicine. 2026;7(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43556-026-00436-1
4. Liu N, Shi Y, Li J, et al. Morphology-guided cellular behavior modulation with 3D-printed engineered ECM. Cell Biomaterials. 2025;1:100090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celbio.2025.100090
5. Zhao T, Huang Y, Zhu J, et al. Extracellular matrix signaling cues: biological functions, diseases, and therapeutic targets. MedComm (Beijing). 2025;6. https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.70281
6. Kolb AD, Bussard KM. The Bone extracellular matrix as an ideal milieu for cancer cell metastases. Cancers. 2019;11(7):1020. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11071020
7. Lin X, Patil S, Gao Y-G, Qian A. The bone extracellular matrix in bone formation and regeneration. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00757
8. Cai W, Huo Y, Liu Y, et al. Biomechanics in bone regeneration and mechanobiology in osteoblasts: Fundamental concepts and recent progress. Eng Medicine. 2025;2:100057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engmed.2025.100057
9. Li M, Zhang A, Li J, et al. Osteoblast/fibroblast coculture derived bioactive ECM with unique matrisome profile facilitates bone regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2020;5(4):938–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.06.017
10. Perepletchikova D, Malashicheva A. Communication between endothelial cells and osteoblasts in regulation of bone homeostasis: Notch players. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2025;16(1):56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-025-04176-x
11. Dalle Carbonare L, Cominacini M, Trabetti E, et al. The bone microenvironment: new insights into the role of stem cells and cell communication in bone regeneration. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2025;16(1):169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-025-04288-4
12. Huang G, Hou T, Song D, Meng T. The regulatory networks and mechanisms of bone microenvironment in tumorigenesis and metastasis. J Bone Oncol. 2025;55:100729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2025.100729
13. Amirazad H, Dadashpour M, Zarghami N. Application of decellularized bone matrix as a bioscaffold in bone tissue engineering. J Biol Eng. 2022;16:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-021-00282-5
14. Li C, An N, Song Q, et al. Enhancing organoid culture: harnessing the potential of decellularized extracellular matrix hydrogels for mimicking microenvironments. J Biomed Sci. 2024;31(1):96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-024-01086-7
15. Guo X, Liu B, Zhang Y, et al. Decellularized extracellular matrix for organoid and engineered organ culture. J Tissue Eng. 2024;15. https://doi.org/10.1177/20417314241300386
16. Kibbey MC. Maintenance of the EHS sarcoma and Matrigel preparation. Journal of Tissue Culture Methods. 1994;16(3–4):227–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01540656
17. Wolff L, Hendrix S. Rethinking Matrigel: The complex journey to matrix alternatives in organoid culture. Advanced Science. 2025;12:47. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202508734
18. Islam MS, Ciavattini A, Petraglia F, et al. Extracellular matrix in uterine leiomyoma pathogenesis: a potential target for future therapeutics. Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24(1):59–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmx032
19. Saad EE, Michel R, Borahay MA. Immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and uterine fibroids: Role in collagen synthesis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2024;75:93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2023.10.002
20. Yang Q, Ciebiera M, Bariani MV, et al. Comprehensive review of uterine fibroids: developmental origin, pathogenesis, and treatment. Endocr Rev. 2022;43(4):678–719. https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnab039
21. Kostina D, Lobov A, Klausen P, et al. Isolation of human osteoblast cells capable for mineralization and synthetizing bone-related proteins in vitro from adult bone. Cells. 2022;11(21):3356. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11213356
22. Kottmann V, Nienhaus M, et al. From bone homeostasis to skeletal metastasis and osteosarcoma: Insights into osteoclast and osteoblast roles in bone remodelling and cancer. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta ‒ Reviews on Cancer. 2026;1881(2):189551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2026.189551
23. Li S, Cai X, Guo J, et al. Cell communication and relevant signaling pathways in osteogenesis–angiogenesis coupling. Bone Res. 2025;13(1):45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-025-00417-0
24. Ma C, Du T, Niu X, Fan Y. Biomechanics and mechanobiology of the bone matrix. Bone Res. 2022;10(1):59. https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41413-022-00223-y
25. Emami A, Izadi E, Oskouie IM. Preservation of extracellular matrix in decellularized bone scaffolds: Strategies, challenges, and future directions. Tissue Cell. 2025;97:103047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2025.103047
26. Li M, Liu X, Tian E, Liao W. The role of collagen in mechanotransduction and its influence on bone metabolic activity. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;318:144968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.144968
27. Brown M, Li J, Moraes C, et al. Decellularized extracellular matrix: New promising and challenging biomaterials for regenerative medicine. Biomaterials. 2022;289:121786. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121786
28. Guo W-Y, Wang W-H, et al. Decellularised extracellular matrix-based injectable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials translational. 2024;5(2):114–128. https://doi.org/10.12336/biomatertransl.2024.02.003
29. Gkantzou E, Rodríguez-Rojas A, et al. Decellularized extracellular matrix for organoids development and 3D Bioprinting. Organoids. 2026;5(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/organoids5010002
30. Zhang X, Chen X, et al. Decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds: Recent trends and emerging strategies in tissue engineering. Bioact Mater. 2022;10:15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.014
31. Yang H, Xia J, et al. From production to the clinic: decellularized extracellular matrix as a biomaterial for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Bioengineering. 2025;13(1):24. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13010024
32. Liang R, Pan R, et al. Decellularized extracellular matrices for skin wound treatment. Materials. 2025;18(12):2752. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18122752
33. Zhu Y, Yang W, et al. Constructing biomimetic microenvironments for liver regeneration. J Nanobiotechnology. 2025;23(1):655. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-025-03729-9
34. Kim JW, Nam SA, et al. Kidney decellularized extracellular matrix enhanced the vascularization and maturation of human kidney organoids. Advanced Science. 2022;9(15). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202103526
35. Liu W, Zhang X, et al. Decellularized extracellular matrix materials for treatment of ischemic cardiomyopathy. Bioact Mater. 2024;33:460–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.10.015
36. Rusinova TV, Vinogradov RA, Asyakina AS, et al. Decellularized nerve scaffold in a rat model of extensive peripheral nerve damage. Modern Technologies in Medicine. 2025;17(6):16. https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2025.17.6.02
37. Kim Y-H, Cidonio G, Kanczler JM, et al. Human bone tissue-derived ECM hydrogels: Controlling physicochemical, biochemical, and biological properties through processing parameters. Bioact Mater. 2025;43:114–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.09.007
38. Go YY, Kim SE, Cho GJ, et al. Differential effects of amnion and chorion membrane extracts on osteoblast-like cells due to the different growth factor composition of the extracts. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0182716. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182716
39. Kang B-J, Ryu H-H, Park S-S, et al. Effect of Matrigel on the osteogenic potential of canine adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Vet Med Sci. 2012;74(7):827–836. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.11-0484
40. Tangporncharoen R, Silathapanasakul A, Tragoonlugkana P, et al. The extracts of osteoblast developed from adipose-derived stem cell and its role in osteogenesis. J Orthop Surg Res 2024;19(1):255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04747-3
41. Wei B, Chen Y, Zhang S, et al. Proteins extracted from placenta regulate osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Cell. 2025;96:103015. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2025.103015
42. Coyle A, Chakraborty A, et al. In vitro engineered ECM-incorporated hydrogels for osteochondral tissue repair: a cell-free approach. Adv Healthc Mater. 2025;14(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202402701
43. Dekker M, Hipwood L, et al. Bone-derived dECM hydrogels support tunable microenvironments for in vitro osteogenic differentiation. Adv Healthc Mater. 2026;15(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202501350
44. Fu T, Liang P, et al. Matrigel scaffolding enhances BMP9-induced bone formation in dental follicle stem/precursor cells. Int J Med Sci. 2019;16(4):567–575. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.30801
45. Jeon J, Lee MS, Yang HS. Differentiated osteoblasts derived decellularized extracellular matrix to promote osteogenic differentiation. Biomater Res. 2018;22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-018-0115-0
46. Nasello G, Alamán-Díez P, et al. Primary human osteoblasts cultured in a 3D microenvironment create a unique representative model of their differentiation into osteocytes. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00336
47. Maggio N, Banfi A. The osteo-angiogenic signaling crosstalk for bone regeneration: harmony out of complexity. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2022;76:102750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102750
48. Perepletchikova D, Kuchur P, Basovich L, et al. Endothelial- mesenchymal crosstalk drives osteogenic differentiation of human osteoblasts through Notch signaling. Cell Communication and Signaling. 2025;23(1):100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-025-02096-0
49. Wang T, Yao H, Jin F, et al. Bidirectional regulation between bone and vasculature: Mechanisms of osteogenesis and angiogenesis. J Adv Res. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2026.02.042
50. Yang Q, Liu S, et al. A new paradigm in bone tissue biomaterials: Enhanced osteogenesis–angiogenic coupling by targeting H-type blood vessels. Biomaterials. 2026;324:123423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123423
51. Laude M, Kolliopoulos V, et al. Extracellular-matrix-based materials from decellularized tissue: opportunities, challenges, and future directions in regenerative medicine. Adv Healthc Mater. 2026;15(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202502107
52. Parasuraman G, Rani J MS, et al. Matrigel-encapsulated articular cartilage derived fibronectin adhesion assay derived chondroprogenitors for enhanced chondrogenic differentiation: An in vitro evaluation. Tissue Cell. 2025;92:102638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2024.102638
Review
For citations:
Serdiukova D.A., Babakovskaya A., Karaman I.A., Floren D.D., Avdeev A.I., Bozhkova S.A., Demidov O.N., Piatnitskaia S.V., Shchekin V.S., Galanova Z.M., Zamanova R.A., Fairushina A.I., Pavlov V.N., Malashicheva A.B. Effect of hydrogel based on tissue extract of uterine leiomyoma enhances osteogenic activity of osteoblasts. Translational Medicine. 2026;13(2):177-187. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2026-13-2-177-187
JATS XML





















