Preview

Translational Medicine

Advanced search

Endovascular occlusion of the left atrialaud in patients with atrial fibrillations. Experience of city hospital

https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2021-6-24-32

Abstract

Background. Endovascular occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) using the Watchman device may be considered an adequate alternative to oral anticoagulant (OAC) administration in high-risk patients.
Objective. To describe our experience with Watchman endovascular occlusion of the left atrial appendage in a city hospital setting in terms of feasibility and safety, as well as assess the short-term efficacy of this procedure.
Design and methods. The study included patients who underwent implantation of the Watchman occlusion device from January 2016 to November 2020. The effectiveness of the procedure was defined as the ability to implant the Watchman without maintaining residual current, safety was defined as the occurrence of nosocomial and 45-day events including stroke, pericardial effusion, major bleeding, and device migration.
Results. The study included 22 patients: 10 men and 12 women, who underwent implantation of the Watchman occluding device in the LAA. The indication for implantation was a history of gastrointestinal bleeding in 15 patients, cerebral hemorrhage in 3 patients and low compliance to therapy in 4 patients. The success rate of the procedure was 95.7 %. According to control transesophageal echocardiography, after 45 days LAA was excluded from the bloodstream in 21 of 22 patients.
Conclusion. Despite the higher complication rate of occlusion of the LAA compared to drug treatment, the overall mortality from any cause in patients with the implanted Watchman was lower.

About the Authors

V. V. Guryev
City Hospital № 40
Russian Federation

Valentin V. Guryev, Interventional cardiologist

Borisova str., 9, Saint Petersburg, 197706


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



S. V. Vlasenko
City Hospital № 40; Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Sergey V. Vlasenko, Ph.D., Interventional cardiologist, Chief of Department; Associate Professor of the Department of Postgraduate Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine

Borisova str., 9, Saint Petersburg, 197706


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



S. G. Shcherbak
City Hospital № 40; Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Sergei G. Shcherbak, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Postgraduate Medical Education; Chief physician

Borisova str., 9, Saint Petersburg, 197706


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



D. N. Lazakovich
City Hospital № 40
Russian Federation

Dmitriy N. Lazakovich, Interventional cardiologist

Borisova str., 9, Saint Petersburg, 197706


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



A. A. Khilchuk
City Hospital № 40; Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Anton A. Khilchuk, Interventional cardiologist, assistant at the Department of Postgraduate Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine

Borisova str., 9, Saint Petersburg, 197706


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



M. V. Agarkov
Gusev Central District Hospital
Russian Federation

Maxim V. Agarkov, Interventional cardiologist, Chief Freelance Specialist of the Kaliningrad Region, Head of the Interventional cardiology Department of the RSC

Gusev


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



V. V. Semenyuta
North-Western State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation

Vyacheslav V. Semenyuta, Cardiovascular surgeon

Saint Petersburg


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



D. A. Vorobyevsky
City Hospital № 40
Russian Federation

Dmitry A. Vorobyevsky, Interventional cardiologist

Borisova str., 9, Saint Petersburg, 197706


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



D. V. Gladyshev
City Hospital № 40; Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Dmitry V. Gladyshev, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Deputy Chief physician for surgery, chief oncologist of the Health Committee

Borisova str., 9, Saint Petersburg, 197706


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



A. M. Osadchiy
City Hospital № 40
Russian Federation

Andrey M. Osadchiy, Ph.D., arrhythmologist

Borisova str., 9, Saint Petersburg, 197706


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



References

1. Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, et al. Population prevalence, incidence, and predictors of atrial fibrillation in the Renfrew/Paisley study. Heart. 2001; 86(5):516–521. DOI: 10.1136/heart.86.5.516.

2. Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, et al. Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation. 2006; 114(2):119-125. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595140.

3. loyd-Jones DM, Wang TJ, Leip EP et al. Lifetime risk for development of atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2004;110(9):1042–1046. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000140263.20897.42.

4. Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2007; 146(12):857–867. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-12-200706190-00007.

5. Gage BF, Boechler M, Doggette AL, et al. Adverse outcomes and predictors of underuse of antithrombotic therapy in medicare beneficiaries with chronic atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2000; 31(4):822–827. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.31.4.822.

6. Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2014; 383(9921):955–962. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62343-0.

7. Aberg H. Atrial fibrillation. I. A study of atrial thrombosis and systemic embolism in a necropsy material. Acta Med Scand. 1969; 185(5):373–379.

8. Stoddard MF, Dawkins PR, Prince CR, et al. Left atrial appendage thrombus is not uncommon in patients with acute atrial fibrillation and a recent embolic event: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25(2):452–459. DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00396-8.

9. Fountain RB, Holmes DR, Chandrasekaran K, et al. The PROTECT AF (WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic PROTECTion in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) trial. Am Heart J. 2006; 151(5):956–961. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.02.005.

10. Hanna IR, Kolm P, Martin R, et al. Left atrial structure and function after percutaneous left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion (PLAATO): six-month echocardiographic follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43(10):1868–1872. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.050.

11. Ostermayer SH, Reisman M, Kramer PH, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion (PLAATO system) to prevent stroke in high-risk patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation: results from the international multi-center feasibility trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46(1):9–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.042.

12. Sick PB, Schuler G, Hauptmann KE, et al. Initial worldwide experience with the WATCHMAN left atrial appendage system for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49(13):1490–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.035.

13. Sievert H, Lesh MD, Trepels T, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion to prevent stroke in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: early clinical experience. Circulation. 2002; 105(16):1887–9. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000015698.54752.6d.

14. Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, et al. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2009; 374(9689):534–542. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61343-X.

15. Reddy VY, Doshi SK, Sievert H, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation: 2.3-Year Follow-up of the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) Trial. Circulation. 2013; 127(6):720–729. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.114389.

16. Lewalter T, Ibrahim R, Albers B, et al. An update and current expert opinions on percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2013; 15(5):652–656. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eut043.

17. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(5):373–498. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612.

18. Osadchy AM, Agarkov MV, Vlasenko SV, et al. Left atrial appendage occluder implantation for prevention of systemic embolism. First experience in the north-west region. Translational Medicine. 2016; 3(3):59–66. In Russian

19. Holmes DR Jr, Kar S, Price MJ, et al. Prospective randomized evaluation of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: the PREVAIL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64(1):1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.029.


Review

For citations:


Guryev V.V., Vlasenko S.V., Shcherbak S.G., Lazakovich D.N., Khilchuk A.A., Agarkov M.V., Semenyuta V.V., Vorobyevsky D.A., Gladyshev D.V., Osadchiy A.M. Endovascular occlusion of the left atrialaud in patients with atrial fibrillations. Experience of city hospital. Translational Medicine. 2021;8(6):24-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2021-6-24-32

Views: 801


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-4495 (Print)
ISSN 2410-5155 (Online)