Endovascular occlusion of the left atrialaud in patients with atrial fibrillations. Experience of city hospital
https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2021-6-24-32
Abstract
Background. Endovascular occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) using the Watchman device may be considered an adequate alternative to oral anticoagulant (OAC) administration in high-risk patients.
Objective. To describe our experience with Watchman endovascular occlusion of the left atrial appendage in a city hospital setting in terms of feasibility and safety, as well as assess the short-term efficacy of this procedure.
Design and methods. The study included patients who underwent implantation of the Watchman occlusion device from January 2016 to November 2020. The effectiveness of the procedure was defined as the ability to implant the Watchman without maintaining residual current, safety was defined as the occurrence of nosocomial and 45-day events including stroke, pericardial effusion, major bleeding, and device migration.
Results. The study included 22 patients: 10 men and 12 women, who underwent implantation of the Watchman occluding device in the LAA. The indication for implantation was a history of gastrointestinal bleeding in 15 patients, cerebral hemorrhage in 3 patients and low compliance to therapy in 4 patients. The success rate of the procedure was 95.7 %. According to control transesophageal echocardiography, after 45 days LAA was excluded from the bloodstream in 21 of 22 patients.
Conclusion. Despite the higher complication rate of occlusion of the LAA compared to drug treatment, the overall mortality from any cause in patients with the implanted Watchman was lower.
About the Authors
V. V. GuryevRussian Federation
Valentin V. Guryev, Interventional cardiologist
Borisova str., 9, Saint Petersburg, 197706
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
S. V. Vlasenko
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Vlasenko, Ph.D., Interventional cardiologist, Chief of Department; Associate Professor of the Department of Postgraduate Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine
Borisova str., 9, Saint Petersburg, 197706
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
S. G. Shcherbak
Russian Federation
Sergei G. Shcherbak, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Postgraduate Medical Education; Chief physician
Borisova str., 9, Saint Petersburg, 197706
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
D. N. Lazakovich
Russian Federation
Dmitriy N. Lazakovich, Interventional cardiologist
Borisova str., 9, Saint Petersburg, 197706
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
A. A. Khilchuk
Russian Federation
Anton A. Khilchuk, Interventional cardiologist, assistant at the Department of Postgraduate Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine
Borisova str., 9, Saint Petersburg, 197706
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
M. V. Agarkov
Russian Federation
Maxim V. Agarkov, Interventional cardiologist, Chief Freelance Specialist of the Kaliningrad Region, Head of the Interventional cardiology Department of the RSC
Gusev
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
V. V. Semenyuta
Russian Federation
Vyacheslav V. Semenyuta, Cardiovascular surgeon
Saint Petersburg
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
D. A. Vorobyevsky
Russian Federation
Dmitry A. Vorobyevsky, Interventional cardiologist
Borisova str., 9, Saint Petersburg, 197706
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
D. V. Gladyshev
Russian Federation
Dmitry V. Gladyshev, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Deputy Chief physician for surgery, chief oncologist of the Health Committee
Borisova str., 9, Saint Petersburg, 197706
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
A. M. Osadchiy
Russian Federation
Andrey M. Osadchiy, Ph.D., arrhythmologist
Borisova str., 9, Saint Petersburg, 197706
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
References
1. Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, et al. Population prevalence, incidence, and predictors of atrial fibrillation in the Renfrew/Paisley study. Heart. 2001; 86(5):516–521. DOI: 10.1136/heart.86.5.516.
2. Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, et al. Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation. 2006; 114(2):119-125. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595140.
3. loyd-Jones DM, Wang TJ, Leip EP et al. Lifetime risk for development of atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2004;110(9):1042–1046. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000140263.20897.42.
4. Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2007; 146(12):857–867. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-12-200706190-00007.
5. Gage BF, Boechler M, Doggette AL, et al. Adverse outcomes and predictors of underuse of antithrombotic therapy in medicare beneficiaries with chronic atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2000; 31(4):822–827. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.31.4.822.
6. Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2014; 383(9921):955–962. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62343-0.
7. Aberg H. Atrial fibrillation. I. A study of atrial thrombosis and systemic embolism in a necropsy material. Acta Med Scand. 1969; 185(5):373–379.
8. Stoddard MF, Dawkins PR, Prince CR, et al. Left atrial appendage thrombus is not uncommon in patients with acute atrial fibrillation and a recent embolic event: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25(2):452–459. DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00396-8.
9. Fountain RB, Holmes DR, Chandrasekaran K, et al. The PROTECT AF (WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic PROTECTion in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) trial. Am Heart J. 2006; 151(5):956–961. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.02.005.
10. Hanna IR, Kolm P, Martin R, et al. Left atrial structure and function after percutaneous left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion (PLAATO): six-month echocardiographic follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43(10):1868–1872. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.050.
11. Ostermayer SH, Reisman M, Kramer PH, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion (PLAATO system) to prevent stroke in high-risk patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation: results from the international multi-center feasibility trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46(1):9–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.042.
12. Sick PB, Schuler G, Hauptmann KE, et al. Initial worldwide experience with the WATCHMAN left atrial appendage system for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49(13):1490–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.035.
13. Sievert H, Lesh MD, Trepels T, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion to prevent stroke in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: early clinical experience. Circulation. 2002; 105(16):1887–9. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000015698.54752.6d.
14. Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, et al. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2009; 374(9689):534–542. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61343-X.
15. Reddy VY, Doshi SK, Sievert H, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation: 2.3-Year Follow-up of the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) Trial. Circulation. 2013; 127(6):720–729. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.114389.
16. Lewalter T, Ibrahim R, Albers B, et al. An update and current expert opinions on percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2013; 15(5):652–656. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eut043.
17. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(5):373–498. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612.
18. Osadchy AM, Agarkov MV, Vlasenko SV, et al. Left atrial appendage occluder implantation for prevention of systemic embolism. First experience in the north-west region. Translational Medicine. 2016; 3(3):59–66. In Russian
19. Holmes DR Jr, Kar S, Price MJ, et al. Prospective randomized evaluation of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: the PREVAIL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64(1):1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.029.
Review
For citations:
Guryev V.V., Vlasenko S.V., Shcherbak S.G., Lazakovich D.N., Khilchuk A.A., Agarkov M.V., Semenyuta V.V., Vorobyevsky D.A., Gladyshev D.V., Osadchiy A.M. Endovascular occlusion of the left atrialaud in patients with atrial fibrillations. Experience of city hospital. Translational Medicine. 2021;8(6):24-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2021-6-24-32