Preview

Translational Medicine

Advanced search

Radiology diagnostics of the diabetic Charcot neuroarthropathy

https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2021-8-1-12-18

Abstract

Diabetic neuroosteoarthropathy (Charcot foot, DNOAP) is the aseptic inflammatory destruction of the joints of the foot or ankle. The outcome of DNOAP is foot deformities of various degrees of severity, which lead to a decrease in the ability to weight-bearing, as well as to a high risk of foot ulcer and amputation. Features of the clinical picture and the lack of reliable diagnostic methods lead to difficulties in the diagnosis of this pathology. Currently, radiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and radioisotope methods are used to visualize Charcot's arthropathy. Plain X-radiography, despite its high availability and low cost, is unsuitable for the diagnosis of DNOAP at an early stage. Magnetic resonance imaging is characterized by high diagnostic significance at an early stage and provides valuable information about the activity of the process during treatment, but it is expensive and limited. Radioisotope techniques are practically unavailable and are used for scientific purposes. At the same time, none of these methods is reliable for the diagnosis of all stages of DNOAP, especially the transition to the inactive stage. The present review characterizes the advantages and disadvantages of these types of diagnostics.

About the Author

V. B. Bregovskiy
Saint Petersburg City Consultative Diagnostic Centre
Russian Federation

Bregovskiy Vadim B. - MD, Dr. Sci., Saint Petersburg City Consultative Diagnostic Centre.

Saint Petersburg.


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest.



References

1. Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in adults. Clinical recommendations of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation. In Russian http://cr.rosminzdrav.ru/recomend/286_1 (05 January 2021).

2. Sohn M-W, Stuck RM, Pinzur M, et al. Lower-extremity amputation risk after charcot arthropathy and diabetic foot ulcer. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33 (1): 98-100. DOI: 10.2337/dc09-1497.

3. Eichenholtz S. Charcot Joints. Wilson. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, Publisher. 1966.

4. Gooday C, Gray K, Game F, et al. Systematic review of techniques to monitor remission of acute Charcot neuroarthropathy in people with diabetes [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 21]. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020; e3328. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3328.

5. Shibata T, Tada K, Hashizume C. The results of arthrodesis of the ankle for leprotic neuroarthropathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72 (5): 749-756.

6. ohnson JE. Operative treatment of neuropathic arthropathy of the foot and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg. 1998; 80 (11): 1700.

7. Sanverdi SE, Ergen BF, Oznur A. Current challenges in imaging of the diabetic foot. Diabet Foot Ankle. 2012; 3. DOI: 10.3402/dfa.v3i0.18754.

8. Schmidt-Bleek K, Schell H, Schulz N, et al. Inflammatory phase of bone healing initiates the regenerative healing cascade. Cell Tissue Res. 2012; 347 (3): 567-573. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-011-1205-7.

9. Zampa V, Bargellini I, Rizzo L, et al. Role of dynamic MRI in the follow-up of acute Charcot foot in patients with diabetes mellitus. Skeletal Radiol. 2011; 40 (8): 991-999. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-010-1092-0.

10. Piaggesi A, Marcocci C, Golia F, et al. Markers for Charcot's neurogenic osteo-arthropathy in diabetic patients. Diabetes. 2000; 49 (5): A32.

11. Schlossbauer T. Mioc T, Sommerey S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in early stage charcot arthropathy: correlation of imaging findings and clinical symptoms. Eur J Med Res. 2008; 13 (9): 409-414.

12. Thorning C, Gedroyc WMW, Tyler PA. Midfoot and hindfoot bone marrow edema identified by magnetic resonance imaging in feet of subjects with diabetes and neuropathic ulceration is common but of unknown clinical significance. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33 (7): 1602-1603. DOI: 10.2337/dc10-0037.

13. Chantelau EA, Grotzner G. Is the Eichenholtz classification still valid for the diabetic Charcot foot? Swiss Med Wkly. 2014; 144: w13948. DOI: 10.4414/smw.2014.13948.

14. Qildag MB, Ertugrul MB, Koseoglu OF, et al. A factor increasing venous contamination on bolus chase three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging: Charcot neuroarthropathy. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2018; 8: 13. DOI: 10.4103/jcis.JCIS_77_17.

15. Thorning C, Gedroyc WMW, Tyler PA. Midfoot and hindfoot bone marrow edema identified by magnetic resonance imaging in feet of subjects with diabetes and neuropathic ulceration is common but of unknown clinical significance. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33 (7): 1602-1603. DOI: 10.2337/dc10-0037.

16. Gooday C, Game F, Woodburn J, et al. A randomised feasibility study of serial magnetic resonance imaging to reduce treatment times in Charcot neuroarthropathy in people with diabetes (CADOM): a protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020; 6: 85. DOI:10.1186/s40814-020-00611-3.

17. Fosbol M, Reving S, Petersen EH, et al. Three-phase bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy in the diabetic foot — does quantitative data improve diagnostic value? Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2017; 37 (1): 30-36. DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12264.

18. Pickwell KM, van Kroonenburgh MJ, Weijers RE, et al. F-18 FDG PET/CT scanning in Charcot disease: a brief report. Clin Nucl Med. 2011; 36 (1): 8-10. DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3181feeb30.

19. Short DJ, Zgonis T. Medical imaging in differentiating the diabetic Charcot foot from osteomyelitis. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 201; 34 (1): 9-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpm.2016.07.002.

20. Walker EA, Beaman FD, Wessell DE, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® suspected osteomyelitis of the foot in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019. 16 (11S): S440-S450. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.027.

21. Demina AG, Bregovskiy VB, Karpova IA. Combination of active stage of diabetic Charcot neuroosteoarthropathy and diabetic lower limb macroangiopathy. Diabetes Mellitus. 2019; 22 (5): 491-498. DOI: 10.14341/DM10103. In Russian


Review

For citations:


Bregovskiy V.B. Radiology diagnostics of the diabetic Charcot neuroarthropathy. Translational Medicine. 2021;8(1):12-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2021-8-1-12-18

Views: 689


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-4495 (Print)
ISSN 2410-5155 (Online)